Sequels tend to make more than their predecessors, no matter how crappy they are (Ratner’s X3 was the highest-grossing X-Men, for example). That’s why they’re such an easy call. Angels and Demons1, meanwhile, made barely more than half Da Vinci Code, which is not only a good indication that the public’s had an ass full of this franchise, but that interest was waning before the last movie came out. Nonetheless, Sony’s has hired a writer to adapt Dan Brown’s latest, The Lost Symbol. Ron Howard and Tom Hanks haven’t signed yet, but they probably will — it’s not like they did the first two for indie cred. You know the drill:
As the story opens, Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon is summoned unexpectedly to deliver an evening lecture in the U.S. Capitol Building. Within minutes of his arrival, however, the night takes a bizarre turn. A disturbing object–artfully encoded with five symbols–is discovered in the Capitol Building. Langdon recognizes the object as an ancient invitation . . . one meant to usher its recipient into a long-lost world of esoteric wisdom. [...] Langdon is instantly plunged into a clandestine world of Masonic secrets, hidden history, and never-before-seen locations–all of which seem to be dragging him toward a single, inconceivable truth. [Amazon via /Film]
As long as Tom Hanks is rocking weird hair and doing a bad Nic Cage impression, they might as well just cast Cage and make it some kind of pop-history, bad hair, buddy professor movie.
HANKS: My great great grandfather Beauregard was ostracized as a coot and died in a mental institution in 1875, but I’ve discovered the clue that proves he was right all along!
CAGE: You don’t mean… Blackbeard’s treasure? You’re crazy, Langdon!
HANKS: Quick! Hand me that penny!




