One of the shadiest things you can do as a journalist is ask someone their opinion about someone, then, when they answer candidly, take their answer out of context to make it sound like they’re starting a beef and manufacture a controversy around it. That being said, controversy = pageviews, pageviews = money, and daddy’s feet = in need of a new pair of shoes. So…
FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! (*flicks lights on and off, claps cats together*)
[CinemaBlend's Katey Rich, on interviewing James Marsh, director of 2008's Oscar-winning documentary Man on Wire, and this year's much-buzzed Project Nim.] I talked to Marsh in an excellent 20-minute conversation this afternoon. Apparently as caught up in all the Sundance gossip as the rest of us, Marsh took some time– totally unprompted by me– to criticize the filmmaker for striking back against critics and audiences after so many years of success.
Here’s what Marsh said:
“You can’t try to control response to your film, nor should you. …Unless you’re Kevin Smith, I guess. Whole other story.
What’s his problem, anyway? Why [does he have a chip on his shoulder]? He’s had such a great run. You know, he’s not Orson Welles.
And, I mean he gets his films made, he’s rich… he’s got money… Now he turns around and says suddenly, “I’m so hard done?” What’s his f*cking problem?”






