
All of the pieces seem to be falling into place rather nicely for Marvel’s giant sci-fi space epic, Guardians of the Galaxy, which will of course be tied into the ever-expanding Avengers universe. With Parks and Rec star Chris Pratt signed on to play the lead character, Star-Lord, they’re just trying to fill in the supporting characters, specifically the voices of the CGI Guardians like Rocket Raccoon and Groot, the giant talking tree.
There was a rumor back in January that Marvel Studios had reached out to Adam Sandler for the voice of Rocket and Jim Carrey for Groot, and while those aren’t exactly the most ideal casting decisions, based on both actors’ recent bodies of work, they at least showed that the studio was devoted to adding serious star power to this comic book’s transition to the big screen.
But just like Jason Momoa, who turned down the role of Drax the Destroyer, we can cross Carrey off the list, too. Promoting The Incredible Burt Wonderstone at SXSW (where Vince is currently trying out pickup lines on Twilight actresses) Carrey shot down that January rumor with authority.
Normally, I’d say that he was just playing coy because he’s at SXSW to promote a specific film and isn’t supposed to be discussing another movie, but he seemed rather adamant about his voice appearing in Guardians being a classic Internet fib. Now if we can just get Sandler to do the same, under oath and loaded with sodium pentothol preferably.



Carrey and Sandler are shells of their former selves… voice work should be the ONLY thing they do henceforth.
Cmon, you can’t compare the two. Sandler is a fucking hack who doesnt’ care anymore. I seriously don’t get all the hate on Carrey. Dude’s funny.
More to the point, once in a while Carrey TRIES.
It’s like when PUNCH DRUNK LOVE fizzled, Sandler was like, “Welp, gave it the ol’ college try, now it’s DERPADADERPADOO.”
Agree with both. Carrey is still funny at least, even at his worse. Sandler… well, you know the drill.
That was a seriously impressive “walk away” answer. Geekscape bro needz more axe.
So… you’re telling me there’s a chance?
Nic Cage isn’t doing anything (in this dimension).
This whole thing sounds stupid as tits on a mule. I smell next year’s John Carter/Jack the Giant Slayer.
You mean a surprisingly good movie nobody sees because “hype”?
me either till a year ago…
I’m looking forward to this movie, so I’m really happy about this development. Ithink adding either of them would make the tone of the movie to tilt toward full comedy as opposed to a en epic scifi “dramedy” staring a talking racoon and tree.
Using this as an opportunity to voice general comic-book-to-movie fatigue:
I never really got into comic books, but I’m not against them and I can see their merit as an art form. If you are into comic books, is this never-ending, snake-digesting-a-cow process of converting every notable comic into a major motion picture enjoyable? If so, why? The translation of art from one form to another (see: every adapted book) undoubtedly has a higher failure than success rate, and add on the crappyness of your average big-budget hollywood production and you end up with a product that usually won’t impress.
So is it fun just to get more attention to a story you love? Or to make it feel more mainstream? I bet the cross section between film aficionados and comic book guys is pretty large, yet I rarely see lots of negative feedback on a comic-to-movie, or concern that so many adaptations are polluting the film landscape… just tons of hype.
My example which I hope will cause rage: I thought avengers was average at best. I’ll argue it to the grave, just not here cuz this is way too long already. But nobody who cares about their internet or nerd cred will say anything other than it was divine.
[/end super long rant..]