
“HW, did you ever hear the philosophy that once a man admits that he’s wrong that he is immediately forgiven for all wrongdoings?”
Oral history articles are like my crack, and I’ve seen Pulp Fiction about a billion times, so Vanity Fair’s new oral history of Pulp Fiction was of obvious interest. Casting is a particularly tricky part of development, and it’s always fun to play the “what if” game (Nick Nolte as Han Solo?!? Nic Cage as Superman?!?). Some Pulp Fiction what-ifs and almost-weres include Daniel Day-Lewis as Vincent Vega, Paul Calderon as Jules Winfield, and Matt Dillon as Butch.
Harvey Weinstein was dead-set against giving the role of Vincent Vega to John Travolta. “John Travolta was at that time as cold as they get,” says Mike Simpson, Tarantino’s agent at William Morris Endeavor. “He was less than zero.” Simpson had given Weinstein a “term sheet” of Tarantino’s demands, which included final cut, a two-and-a-half-hour running time, and final choice of actors. “One of the actors I had on the list was John Travolta,” says Tarantino. “And it came back: ‘The entire list is approved . . . except for John Travolta.’ So I got together with Harvey, and he’s like, ‘I can get Daniel Day-Lewis, Sean Penn, William Hurt.’” By then, according to Simpson, “Daniel Day-Lewis and Bruce Willis, who was the biggest star in Hollywood, had both gotten their hands on the script and wanted to play Vincent Vega.”
John Travolta was washed up before Pulp Fiction, he was amazing in Pulp Fiction, and he hasn’t really done anything great since. Casting Travolta wasn’t like Christoph Waltz, where Tarantino discovered this amazing actor that no one had seen before. Travolta was around, but no one else thought he had it in him. I don’t know how many times Tarantino had to watch Look Who’s Talking coked out of his face to see that role in Travolta, but it’s one of the all-time serendipitous castings, where persona and role lined up just perfectly. It’s also fun to imagine Daniel Day-Lewis doing Pulp Fiction lines all perfectly enunciated in his Daniel Plainview voice. “Now HW, eating a bitch out and giving a bitch a foot massage ain’t even the same thing!” (I know that’s a Jules line, but I don’t care).
Bruce Willis’s interest in the project relieved Weinstein’s concerns that the movie lacked bankable stars. With the main role of Vincent Vega already cast, the only option for Willis was Butch, the boxer—which Tarantino had promised to Matt Dillon.
“So he gave Matt the script,” Simpson [Tarantino's agent] tells Seal [Vanity Fair Editor], “and he read it and said, ‘I love it. Let me sleep on it.’ Quentin then called me and said, ‘He’s out. If he can’t tell me face-to-face that he wants to be in the movie—after he read the script—he’s out.’” So the role went to Willis. “Once I got Bruce Willis, Harvey got his big movie star, and we were all good,” says Tarantino. “Bruce Willis made us legit. Reservoir Dogs did fantastic internationally, so everyone was waiting for my new movie. And then when it was my new movie with Bruce Willis, they went apeshit.”
In 2013, there’s no way someone with Tarantino’s 1994 level of fame is allowed to cast the 1994 equivalent John Travolta. These days, a studio would never let you take a chance on an actor, you’d have to take their boring famous person suggestion, probably someone like 2013 Travolta. Whoa, I think I just incepted myself.
The role of Jules Winnfield proved difficult to cast, mainly because Samuel L. Jackson was under the impression the part was his, until he found out he was in danger of losing the role to Paul Calderon. Jackson flew out to L.A. for a last-ditch audition with Tarantino. “I sort of was angry, pissed, tired,” Jackson recalls. He was also hungry, so he bought a takeout burger on his way to the studio, only to find nobody there to greet him. “When they came back, a line producer or somebody who was with them said, ‘I love your work, Mr. Fishburne,’” says Jackson. “It was like a slow burn. He doesn’t know who I am? I was kind of like, F*ck it. At that point I really didn’t care.” Gladstein remembers Jackson’s audition: “In comes Sam with a burger in his hand and a drink in the other hand and stinking like fast food. Me and Quentin and Lawrence were sitting on the couch, and he walked in and just started sipping that shake and biting that burger and looking at all of us. I was scared shitless. I thought that this guy was going to shoot a gun right through my head. His eyes were popping out of his head. And he just stole the part.” Lawrence Bender adds, “He was the guy you see in the movie. He said, ‘Do you think you’re going to give this part to somebody else? I’m going to blow you motherf*ckers away.’”
Samuel L. Jackson yelling “MMM-MMM, this IS a tasty BURGER!” is probably my favorite part of that entire movie. And to think, that whole scene wouldn’t even exist if not for Samuel Jackson raging-eating a hamburger while threatening to shoot a motherf*cker for not being to tell him from another black guy. Stories like this are why I started this site. How could you cover the movie business and have it be anything but comedy?



I can actually picture Matt Dillon as Butch.
Yeah, me too. As much as i love Bruce Willis, Rusty James would have been really cool in that role as well.
It would have been cool if instead of that French chick, Butch’s girlfriend was played by Denise Richards and Neve Campbell. But then I say that about every part in every movie.
Makes me wonder how many shitty movies would have been amazing if not for last minute casting changes.
I.E. the airplane losing out the the slow ass cruise ship in Speed 2.
Like Cusak as the main character in Singles instead of Campbell Scott.
DDL as Vincent Vega? My Left Foot-rub?
In the diner he would have ordered somebody else’s milkshake.
Christopher Walken as “The Wolf” would have been pretty fucking cool.
/yes i just made that up, i know Vince didn’t mention it.
“he was amazing in Pulp Fiction, and he hasn’t really done anything great since.”
Uhhhh Sorry? Have we forgotten about Broken Arrow? “Fuck ‘em if they can’t take a joke”
Also Get Shorty and Face/Off. Then he washed the fuck back up.
I thought he was cool in Swordfish. Pretty decent villain in the Thomas Jane version of Punisher as well.
Bolt is fucking awesome, too.
His best post-Pulp Fiction role is ‘Hairspray.” You can scoff, but he plays Christopher Walken’s massively overweight 1960s housewife. They even have a romantic dance number together. How could you not love that?
@Juan_Carlo: Divine did that part better in the original. Of course, so did everybody else.
Face/Off is fantastic, Get Shorty ain’t too bad either. And Swordfish is one of my favorite terrible movies to watch.
saying that John Travolta was “AMAZING” in Pulp Fiction is just plain lies. He was mediocre. adequate. didn’t step on Sam Jackson’s ego too much. The fact that he was in something taht didn’t put him opposite talking babies or men in leotards was such a departure from his shit-tastic career that people got confused and thought he was great. He wasn’t. He just wasn’t awful, and taht was good enough not to kill an otherwise well cast movie.
He was amazing at going to the bathroom and not stealing scenes.
I don’t know if you’ve ever done heroin before but that mother fucker was amazing at looking like he was high as fuck on heroin.
He did play the role pretty well. It was understated, that was a nice counter to Samuel Jackson.
It wasn’t a showy performance, but the understatedness of it was just right.
I think Daniel Day Lewis would have been fine too, though. His performance in “9″ proved that he can do understated too when he really wants and doesn’t have to go crazy over the top method for every role.
being understated in a Tarantino movie is like being an extra in a porno.
He hit that role perfectly. Would not have been the same otherwise. He was both likeable and hateable and arrogant and derpy. That shit had layers.
Putting Travolta in that role did a lot more to help his career than it did to help the movie. He wasn’t spectacular, but he was good. The pairing of him and Sam Jackson is about as ideal a duo as you could find for that movie. They played off each other well.
In a perfect world John Woo never came to America, it waited 15 more years and came to him.
Umm, that was supposed to be @PowerClashing.
I remember going to see it at the theater and having heard all this hype about how great John Travolta’s return to serious acting was, and then thinking as I watched “Were they serious? He’s playing a mopey junkie who gets to be Sam Jackson’s mumbley straight man. What the fuck were they watching?”
Who is today’s ’94 version of Travolta? A former huge star, teen idol, closet homosexual, outstanding dancer, now slumming in shitty family-friendly comedies. There’s a diamond in the rough out there somewhere that we’re missing.
Justin Timberlake.
Zac Efrom?
Zac Efron is going the other way, in that the stuff he’s doing is getting darker and weirder. He’s like a poor man’s Shia LaBeouf.
Charlie Sheen.
Donnie Osmond?
Zak Efron is surprisingly good in The Paperboy for someone who was a Bieber before bieber
Kirk Cameron.
Cuba Gooding jr.
Richard Greico?
wait I’ve got more. the London brothers? Chris Klein? Judd Nelson Edward Furlong Val Kilmer, Christian Slater, Lou Diamond Phillips, Ralph Maccio, Corey Feldman.
AB, most of the guys on that list never reached the height of fame that Travolta did in his early years. He went from A-List, to a leper, then did it all again.
Christian Slater’s pretty close, but I think he’s already missed his Pulp Fiction 1994 moment. Ben Affleck but his Pulp Fiction was directing?
Charlie Sheen makes some sense, but he’s got his own pretty special brand of bizarre career trajectory. What about his brother though? Emilio seems too normal to become anything like the Travolta of today, but a Pulp Fiction level comeback would be similarly shocking and satisfying for me.
There’s got to be one more that would be even better… Jeff Goldblum? Hugh Grant? Topher Grace or James Franco in 6 years? Dunno, not feeling it.
I think Affleck might be a pretty good one, but he seems to be generally done with acting full-time. If he made a comeback, I think it would be similar. After Gigli and Jersey Girl, he was pretty much a leper.
Daniel Day-Lewis would have requested actual heroin for the role. And I could totally see Quentin Tarantino accidentally snorting it and ODing. Let’s just say a disaster was probably averted.
The Coke Wizard always has an adrenaline shot on hand.Y’know, just in case.
I’ve got to figure there’s like a 20% chance Tarentino wrote the scene imagining that exact possibility.
“Ladies and gentlemen… I’ve traveled over half our state to be here tonight. I couldn’t get away sooner because Marcellus Wallace’s wife needed babysitting and I had to see about it. This woman almost overdosed on heroin after we got 5 dollar fucking shakes. They were pretty good, but not worth 5 dollars. Are you aware what they call a Quarter Pounder with cheese in France? No?? They call it a Royal with Cheese. So, ladies and gentlemen… if I say I’m a hit man you will agree. You have a great chance here, but bear in mind, you can lose it all if you’re not careful. Out of all men that beg for a chance to kill your asshole bad guys, maybe one in twenty will be hitmen; the rest will be speculators-that’s men trying to get between you and the hitmen-to get some of the money that ought by rights come to you. Even if you find one that has money, and means to kill, he’ll maybe know nothing about killing and he’ll have to hire out the job on contract, and then you’re depending on a contractor that’s trying to rush the job through so he can get another contract just as quick as he can. This is… the way that this works.”
What’s the price of a milkshake matter if you’re drinking someone else’s?
Brilliant sir
Basic was kind of a stupid movie. But that role was pretty much John Travolta.
This is awesome, but can the Random Uproxx Article Generator at the bottom of the page please, please be rejiggered so that I don’t have to read the Klaus Kinski headline every single time?
I always got the feeling that Tarantino’s casting of Travolta was partially inspired by Richard Gere’s character in the 83 version of Breathless (often cited as one of the worst films ever made, usually by people who are stupid and wrong, watching it today you can totally imagine a young QT jacking off to it), a kind of sleazy hoodlum, cocky but not afraid to show weakness of character, somebody with just enough cools and charm to carry it off, the kind of thing Gere was doing all the time in his early career and something Travolta has done to lesser extent in his younger days.
I still want to visit the parallel universe where DDL does the twist with Uma.
If it doesn’t feature the rape of a journalist, I’ll have no part of it.
Travolta’s performance lies somewhere in-between AMAZING and AWFUL. Let me explain that wide generalization…
When I watched the movie, I liked him as a character and his portrayal, but I didn’t go “OMG, Travolta knocked that out of the park!” He was a good cog in a movie full of great parts that made an amazing sum. However, I know other people saw Travolta in something other than a shitty movie about talking babies or dogs, did a good job with it, and went “HE WAS AMAZING!” Well yeah, compared to the normal shit he does, that performance was good. But if a respected actor like Daniel Day-Lewis had given that performance, would you still call it amazing? Probably not…you probably say it was, at best, par for the course with him and, at worst, not one of his better acting jobs. On the flip side, all of this praise for Travolta in the movie might lead others to hear the hype, watch the movie for the first time and say he sucked mainly because they weren’t blown away by his performance. If you say a McDonald’s cheeseburger is the best burger you’ve ever had, when you eat the burger and it is by far not living up to that hype, the first thing you’ll say is “What are you talking about? That sucked!” Whoa, hey! A McDonald’s cheeseburger is delicious and cheap and how dare you bad mouth it! But you’re right that it’s by far not living up to that previous hype.
I think what I’m getting at is Travolta’s performance in Pulp Fiction is a McDonald’s cheeseburger.
I always went under the assumption that he wanted Travolta solely for the dance-off scene. A Tarantino-cinema homage before that term was self-parodying.
Definitely. In terms the range that’s been outlined above, I fall somewhere in between “Travolta was good but not great” and “well, he was pretty perfect for the role, and he *was* great at seeming really high.” But while the dancing scene could have been awesome with someone else, it wouldn’t have had the same impact, and it wouldn’t have been as much fun for Tarentino to film.
I also think it’s possible the movie wouldn’t have sold nearly as many tickets without that visual. It might not be knock-your-socks-off acting, but there is no one else who could everything that Tarentino wanted out of that role as effectively as Travolta did. Really remarkable, prescient casting, even if you don’t love Travolta’s acting in the film.
Difference:
Daniel Day-Lewis as a method actor has a parade of large black men over to his house so he can watch them be sodomized while wearing a ball gag.
John Travolta is not a method actor.
I think I see what you were trying to go for, but Vincent Vega isn’t involved in the rape sequence. Thanks for playing.
Everyone bashes on Travolta for Look who’s Talking, Does anyone remember that Bruce Willis is the voice of the baby?