
As it was already predicted last week, Django Unchained is on pace to become Tarantino’s highest-grossing movie, outpacing Inglourious Basterds at a similar point in its roll out. Easing just 33 percent from last week (by contrast, superhero movies and horror regular have second-weekend drops of more than 50 percent), Django crossed $106 million in its second weekend, something that took Inglourious 23 days. As you’ll learn in any business school, a little controversy over constantly saying n**ger never hurt anyone.
Of course, highest grossing doesn’t mean most successful. Adjusted for inflation, “Pulp Fiction,” which amassed its $200 million-plus nearly 20 years ago, would be the top earner among the Tarantino oeuvre. Moreover, it still ranks as the director’s most successful film having been produced for a meager $8 million. [TheWrap]
As it should be. Meanwhile, Django‘s $20 million take wasn’t the number one of the weekend. That honor goes to Texas Chainsaw 3D.
Texas Chainsaw 3D‘s $23 million was directly between the 2003 remake ($28.1 million) and the 2006 prequel ($18.5 million), though attendance was about in line with the 2006 movie.
Raise your hand if you can explain the plot continuity of those three movies. That way I know which people and I should never hang out.
More so than any other studio, Lionsgate has consistently been successful at making and marketing low-budget genre fare like Texas Chainsaw 3D. They execute cost-effective advertising that smartly hones in on the prospective audience while ignoring everyone else, and the results generally suggest that this is a worthwhile strategy. It doesn’t hurt in this case that Texas Chainsaw is an established brand, and surely fans of the original made up a decent portion of the opening weekend audience.
The movie’s grosses were front-loaded (Friday accounted for 44 percent of the weekend), and it received a weak “C+” CinemaScore; with any other genre, these would be bad signs, but they are both fairly standard in horror. As a result, a final total north of $50 million is definitely doable.
The audience was 52 percent female and 64 percent under 25 year-of-age. Lionsgate is reporting that one in three of those younger attendees stated that a primary reason for their attendance was singer Trey Songz‘s starring role. [BoxOfficeMojo]
Trey who what now? Trey Songz is a person? That’s an interesting name spelling, is he Hungarian? Or is it simply a stage name meant to indicate “lots of songs?” In fact, did anyone else try to read that block quote, only to hear the confusing, unintelligible shriek of children?





Django cost a hundred million? My my, I guess blood squibs are expensive in this economy.
The Wrap says it cost $87 million, whatever that means.
[www.thewrap.com]
As are acting fees for DiCaprio, Foxx, etc. I would imagine.
Ray Charles jackets and Kate Winslet fleshlights don’t pay for themselves, son!
If you wanna hang out
You gotta take her out
COCAINE.
Not to mention that Leo has to be thrill killing super models at this point, and covering that up can’t be cheap.
The moral of this story is: people love to watch other people say the “n-word.” John Carter wouldn’t have been such a flop if it had 125 utterances of the “n-word.” Why, even The Oogieloves in the BIG Balloon Adventure would have been a huge success if every one of the puppet characters used the “n-word” repeatedly.
At least, a succès d’estime.
Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3D – When the massacres on the news just don’t do it for you anymore.
In an effort to improve their ratings, CNN will start broadcasting their Newtown coverage in 3D.
Note that “Massacre” doesn’t appear in the title: “We taken the massacre out of Texas Chainsaw Massacre! At least, we took it out of the title, don’t confuse this with a documentary about guys trimming trees!”
“We taken?” Pardon my ignorant writing, I meant to write “We have tooken.” “We tooked?”
“Hmmm, I want to see something that says I have shitty taste in movies AND music, what to watch, what to watch…”
-Prospective Texas Chainsaw Patron
I guess Jack Reacher is a dud? Nobody buying into 5 foot tall world beaters anymore?
Did better than I thought it would with that shithouse title and lame marketing.
It’s already over its budget on domestic earnings alone, which means it’ll probably end up solidly profitable.
It wasn’t bad, but it was utterly forgettable. I saw it three weeks ago and I can’t remember for the life of me what it was about.
I was basing it on the money it’s made compared to what its cost, but it will be out for a few more weeks so I guess not. Anyways, I’m sure I’ll watch it 5x on Spike by the end of the year.
This weekend I finally saw This Is 40. Also saw Three Stooges on HBO. One was borderline unwatchable, just excruciating, hate-inducing and I want everyone associated with it punished. The other was Three Stooges.
Can we just start measuring box office as ‘Tickets sold’ already. Ass’s in seats is a much better metric for success.
Huh, I just assumed that shrieking was another child falling through the trap door I had installed in front of my door.
*Raises hand
Let me break it down for you Vince, I’ll just go over the new films in the “remake” canon.
Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003 was a remake of the original 1974 classic. TCM: The Beginning (2006) was a prequel to said remake. And this new film is actually a SEQUEL to the original 2012 film, making technically not even part of the remake’s canon I guess. I’m not even really sure as I’ve only watched the first 2 remakes in a state of extreme drunken rage. I’m a huge fan of the original and these modern iterations are just unfiltered garbage (as is the majority of modern horror) That said, I still hope we can be friends. Frot on.
Oh fine, I guess so. but how do I know I won’t come to regret this? You definitely will.
Jessica Biel in ass tight jeans and a half top was very watchable.
I may just be a simple crawfish farmer from South Louisiana, but for what I lack in worldliness I make up for in panache. Also we can sing 90 alternative rock songs together.