
The stereotype of the troubled porn star is as well-entrenched as the sad clown, or the insufferable Will Smith offspring, augmented by the long list of infamous porn star suicides, like Savannah, who killed herself after she cut her face in a car accident, or Alex Jordan, who famously addressed her suicide note to her pet parrot. But Laurence Fishburne can sleep a little easier tonight (a little) thinking about his daughter, because, according to a new study, porn actresses are actually psychologically healthier than the rest of these prude chicks who won’t even pretend to love the taste of semen. So next time you see a shaved blonde with big naturals, maybe don’t be so quick to judge.
The latest edition of the Journal of Sex Research has challenged the stereotype that porn actresses have poor self-images and a history of sexual abuse. A report suggests that porn stars have higher self-esteem, a better quality of life and body image, and are more spiritual than their non-adult entertainment counterparts.
“More spiritual?” Hmmm, how do you test for that one, by counting religious quote tattoos?
Researchers at Pennsylvania’s Shippensburg University, Texas Woman’s University and the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation compared 177 porn actresses to a sample of women matched on age, ethnicity, and marital status. Comparisons were based on sexual behaviors and attitudes, self-esteem, quality of life and drug use. Sun News reports that the actresses in the study had all been paid to work on at least one X-rated movie and ranged in age from 18 to 50. Their average career in the industry was 3.5 years.
Shippensburg? Texas Woman’s University? Come on, those aren’t real colleges, are they? Those are fake porn schools where all the students are petite 30-year-old chicks in pigtails calling themselves “barely legal.”
Results showed that the X-Rated stars were more likely to say they enjoyed sex — no surprise there — but perhaps contrary to popular notions, porn stars weren’t any more likely to have had endured sexual abuse than those in the control group. However, some of the results confirmed popular stereotypes. For example, the actresses reported using more drugs than the control group while they also reported having sex for the first time at a younger age (15) than the control group (17). [NYPost]
The increased levels of sex and drug use probably account for the higher scores on quality of life. Anyway, you can hear all about the study and the ins and outs of the researchers’ particularly methodology in the upcoming documentary version of the report, “Broads Gettin’ Pol’ed.”



No it wasn’t sexual abuse. She wanted to have sex with her mom’s boyfriend when she was thirteen.
Breaking News: People who have sex all the time are happy.
Depressed porn stars? It’s probably the crank.
I would have believed this study if it came from Morehead State University.
+1
I would not be surprised if the Pornstars who enter THIS BUSINESS because they are comfortable with themselves, like sex and want to make a quick buck for having sex with a stranger (which they’d just do at a club anyway), yeah, they are probably going to have a high self-esteem.
It’s a good thing 100% of women freely admit to being victims of sexual abuse.
Besides, most porn chicks are aged 18-22. I’m pretty sure that’s the part of their lives where they know themselves the best. You know, before they experience life. Life can only get in the way of knowing yourself.
Above stats via University of Phoenix School of Philosophology.
I wonder where Hayden Panettiere falls out between the control group and the adult actresses.
In 1995, I met a girl from Shippensburg University leaving a phish show. Then I fucked her someplace real uncomfortable… like the back of a volkswagen. Just thought I’d provide the only knowledge I have about “the Ship” (that’s seriously what they call it).
My good buddy went to Shippensburg for two years. He was knee-deep in poon while he was there but he was also miserable. Take that how you will.
Now I can’t walk by the Baked Naturals at the store without laughing, either.
Hmmm…I bet AB’s Phish chick had “baked naturals”. heh
If the average career in an industry only lasts 3.5 years, that’s a pretty good indication that it’s pretty rough.
They definitely rack up the miles fast and they are not highway miles.
It’d be interesting to know what the most prevalent reasons for leaving the porn industry are: the performer burns out and leaves, leaves voluntarily for another reason (gets his/her medical degree, graduates from law school, they just needed enough money for grandma’s operation, and that sort of thing), or leaves involuntarily (can’t get work because they’re unreliable or too old, etc.)?
Well, obviously they become so happy, confident and just plain awesome all around they just can’t stand it anymore.
Average career in porn is 3.5 years. Nina Harley is going on 25 years in the biz. Stats tell you that some chick out there got uncomfortably reamed in one flick and said “Screw this, I’m going back to the night shift at Denny’s.”
Don’t anybody tell Brett.
It doesn’t matter how happy THEY are, it only matters how happy they make ME!
I’m conflicted about whether this makes my masturbation more or less satisfying.
Research I’ve done on my own has led me to believe that pizza delivery guys also have higher self esteem and their lives are super great.
How do you think Glenn from The Walking Dead has done so well in the Zombie Apocalypse?
All I can guess that for at least some of these women, the fact that they are comfortable in front of a camera might show that they are more comfortable with themselves. I went out with a very good looking chick who was not comfortable with herself, and thus bad at sex.
Hours and hours of research for a good cause
they tried to do a similar study on male porn actors but it was inconclusive since every subject started off with an inflated p-value
/looks at poli sci degree
//contemplates changing out of sweatpants on a tuesday afternoon
p-values are constrained on a [0,1] interval. In what units are you measuring your unit?
you’re making me go deeper into this joke than i intended, but the unit of measurement is penalty yards assessed for a false start outside the penalized team’s own 5-yard line, because a p-value less than .05 would be considered insignificant in either the porn business or statistics.
They’re only spiritual if you consider cock worshiping an acceptable religion.
well, that all seems legit. just a case of waiting for the peer reviewed confirmation of the report’s findings.
Shippensburg ’89. Go Raiders.