
After director Tony Scott jumped off the Vincent Thomas Bridge in Long Beach on Sunday, a lot of us were like “Huh, maybe he had cancer or something,” because it’s nice when people who commit suicide have a reason. Brings logic to a chaotic universe and all of that. So then when ABC reported half a day later that “a source close to Tony Scott” told them that Scott had been diagnosed with inoperable brain cancer, we were all like, “well sure, that makes sense.” Except now, according to TMZ, it wasn’t true.
Tony Scott did NOT have inoperable brain cancer, or for that matter brain cancer at all … this according to Scott’s family.
TMZ has learned … Scott’s wife told investigators the rumor that Tony had inoperable brain cancer is “absolutely false.”
Although the autopsy results have been deferred pending more tests, our sources say there is no evidence of brain cancer. [TMZ]
Hmm, well are your sources doctors who were involved in the autopsy? Because if they’re just random people off the street or, like, bus drivers or something, I’d be less inclined to believe them. In fact, why don’t you give us a hint as to these sources are? I don’t know if you’re aware of this, but we kind of got burned on the whole “unidentified source” thing recently.
NEXT UP! TMZ and ABC’s anonymous sources battle to the death in an invisible cage of ambiguity! Will someone survive? Will an unidentified entity perish? Is John Travolta gay? NO ONE KNOWS AND WE MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO TELL YOU! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT…
[Picture source: NewsDaily]



I literally just posted an article on the Huffington Post about how the media doesn’t cite sources and fucks about like this. It hasn’t been a day and they already made asses of themselves for this story. I may….I may of predicted the future, guys. (High Fives Corgi).
[www.huffingtonpost.com]
You write articles and don’t know the difference between “of” and “have”?
I’m on a forum. I could give a shit.
*couldn’t
burned^^
Say what you like about Tony Scott, he certainly made one hell of a splash. *armpit-fart*
Well, now I’m definitely autoerotic asphyxiating myself.
Have no fear, Will McAvoy will retroactively clear this shit up in about a year.
We’ll see.
But this is definitely one of those rare instances where hearing about somebody NOT having cancer is a huge bummer. I mean other than Seltzer & Friedberg of course.
This comment better not come back and haunt me two years from now when Seltzer and Friedberg tandem-jump to their untimely deaths in an obscure pop cultural spoof on Tony Scott’s suicide.
On a more serious note, I do hope you get to re-use that “not cancer” tag every now and then.
This conspiracy has Ozymandias’ fingerprints all over it.
(revisited Watchmen this weekend; still good)
Protip : When the producer of Prometheus sacrifices himself in exactly the same puzzling way as did the engineer in the first scene of the movie… it’s time to buy a flamethrower.
Well, I hope Tony Scott knew he didn’t have cancer. If/when I kill myself by jumping off a bridge, I don’t want it to be because of a mis-diagnosis.
It looks like brain cancer is getting off…Scott free
YYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!
Even after all the hard-hitting reporting by TMZ, ABC and Vince, this post still fails to answer the one question on everybody’s mind: So was Alfred Hitchcock a crook or not?
I’m looking at you, cyber-bullying…
18-08-2012, 6:47 PM –”Top Gun”? More like “Top DUMB”, ammIright??
19-08-2012, 10:38 AM — “I saw True Romance. Shoulda called it “POO” Romance LOL!”
19-08-2012, 12:12 PM — “Spy GAYme is more liek itWOOT!”
The moral of the story: Don’t jump to conclusions.
Why not? He jumped to his.
wokka wokka wokka
*claps