
Peter Jackson is set to make history today after confirming rumors that The Hobbit would be cut into three movies instead of two, the first time in history that an adaptation of a book will take longer to watch than the book does to read. “Watch The Hobbit?! Aw, c’mon, Mrs. M, can’t I just read the book?”
Part one is scheduled for December, part two for December 2013, and part three summer 2014. Peter Jackson explained his approach, which I like to call “Tantric Filmmaking,” in a personal note on his Facebook page:
It is only at the end of a shoot that you finally get the chance to sit down and have a look at the film you have made. Recently Fran, Phil and I did just this when we watched for the first time an early cut of the first movie – and a large chunk of the second. We were really pleased with the way the story was coming together, in particular, the strength of the characters and the cast who have brought them to life. All of which gave rise to a simple question: do we take this chance to tell more of the tale? And the answer from our perspective as the filmmakers, and as fans, was an unreserved ‘yes.’
We know how much of the story of Bilbo Baggins, the Wizard Gandalf, the Dwarves of Erebor, the rise of the Necromancer, and the Battle of Dol Guldur will remain untold if we do not take this chance. The richness of the story of The Hobbit, as well as some of the related material in the appendices of The Lord of the Rings, allows us to tell the full story of the adventures of Bilbo Baggins and the part he played in the sometimes dangerous, but at all times exciting, history of Middle-earth.
So, without further ado and on behalf of New Line Cinema, Warner Bros. Pictures, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Wingnut Films, and the entire cast and crew of The Hobbit films, I’d like to announce that two films will become three.
It has been an unexpected journey indeed, and in the words of Professor Tolkien himself, “a tale that grew in the telling.”
Cheers,
Peter J
Ugh. Three Lord of the Rings movies, and now three Hobbit movies. If the last three are as long as the first three, we’re going on almost 18 hours of hobbitry now, for a story that was like 50 percent unnecessary epilogues to begin with. Three hours of content stretched into 18? I think Peter Jackson may have gotten into Kevin Smith’s weed stash.



Oh boy, now we’ll learn the fate of that guy who was in the background when that thing was happening! You know, that guy.
I’m beginning to get really worried that Jackson will one day remake “The Neverending Story” and make the title literal.
The cartoon is on youtube. It’s all of 77 minutes and it doesn’t leave a whole lot out. These movies are going to be overindulgent. Wish they had done “The Hobbit” first. Then somebody would have been able to restrain Jackson.
[www.youtube.com]
I don’t care, *I* am excited to see Bilbo run around with his thirteen beards.
Wait, does this mean more filming? Because if it delays the next season of Sherlock, I will cut a bitch.
unnecessary epilogues? oh you will rue this day Mancini, rue it you will!
Peter Jackson is The Nobbit.
Ok, so in THIS shot, let’s show Bilbo walking for 42 minutes.
The book is less than 200 pages (I think). This is fucking stupid.
310 pages.
6 hours >> 360 minutes.
WHAT THE FUCK SOME OF THOSE PAGES ARE JUST FUCKING SONGS.
Artistic integrity my ass…. three installments equals another half billion plus.
Well, ‘baters gonna ‘bate.
That said, I’m going to watch the shit out of all of these movies.
Sadly, this isn’t the type of over-indulgence that can be corrected by surgery
The more I read about the Hobbit, the less enjoyable it seems to be.
Is he going to show the scene where the director plucks out his eye so that Mordor can have it’s biggest tourist attraction?
Jackson likes big fucking spectacles and there’s not a lot of them in The Hobbit, Five Armies notwithstanding. This gives him a reason to crowbar in a few more battle scenes like the ones he splooged all over The Two Towers and Return of the King.
I’ve already started my nap. Seriously the shortest and best book of the series because its not completely bloated by Tolkien telling us about shit we don’t need to know and Jackson turns it into a bloated trilogy. No thanks.
I will watch this. Every minute. Hell, I’ll take that world over this one any day.
“It’s too long” “It’s bloated” “Over-indulgent”
You all sound like a bunch of girls who are all on their period at the same time and so are mad about the same stuff
Thank god. I was worried that I would only see 6 hours of Bilbo eating a shitload of breakfasts while a bunch of bearded assholes run around with axes making dwarf-tossing jokes.
Are there really a lot of people out there who were super excited to see two Hobbit films, but found out that there are going to be three of them and decided to tear up their refillable popcorn tub?
You know what worries me?
So waaaay back, when I was a wee lad, my mom read me The Hobbit. And I loved it to death. But when it was over, I remember her telling me that it was just a small adventure, and THE LORD OF THE RINGS was the REAL DEAL. A massive, massive quest, for the fate of the world. I felt like the stakes were so much higher, and I became so enthralled when we started Fellowship.
ANYWAY. What I’m worried about is, if he stretches The Hobbit into a sprawling trilogy, with massive battles and shit, what does this inadvertently do to his LOTR trilogy? It’s going to weaken their impact. The Hobbit should have always been a lighthearted adventure.
I know that cash rules everything around Hollywood (C.R.E.A.H) and if there was ever the possibility of making more films out of The Hobbit, it WAS going to happen. But the LOTR trilogy will suffer. And that sucks.
:(
This is the man who turned the simple pulpy story of a giant Gorilla climbing the Empire State Building into an overblown, self-indulgent 200 minute bore. He just doesn’t know how to get to the point.
I can’t wait to not watch these movies.
COCK
Stretching a comparatively small amount of plot into hours and hours of filler and epilogues…sounds like this might just be the most true to the source adaptation of the hobbit yet!
You! Shall! Not! Pass up the opportunity to excessively expand relatively sparse source material.
Just remember, every time someone watches a Lord of the Rings movie, Michael Bay dies a little inside. Let’s all do our part.
I always did feel like tolkien jibbed us when we’re basically just told there was some big awesome battle we didn’t see (Battle of Dol Guldur). I’m still trying to figure out where the dividing points would be in the book plot for the movies, but as long as they’ve got more Beorn I’ll be happy.
C.S. Lewis was the master of that. When describing scary monsters and shit, he would write “they were awful creatures, just awful….I can’t even write how awful they were, they were so awful.”
Like…mofucka, you HAVE to write about that shit. You’re a WRITER. I fucking hate C.S. Lewis.
Hm. Was going to watch it when it was one movie, a little annoyed but still wanted to watch it when it was two. Now I think I’ll give this a pass, at least until the DVD comes out and I can fastforward through all the filler.
Peter Jackson announces solution to job security woes.