
"Stand still so they can digitize you. I hired Andy Serkis to do all the acting."
Don’t ask me why, but it seems like every time I post something technical, it sparks the most heated debates. The Hobbit/48 fps opinion round-up was drawing new comments for weeks, and people seem to get extra heated about film vs. digital. For what it’s worth, it now seems Martin Scorsese has made the permanent switch from film to digital. To me it just seems like a smart decision. Have you seen those eyebrows? With Marty, there’s ALWAYS hair in the gate.
“It would appear that we’ve lost the battle,” said Thelma Schoonmaker, the director’s long-time editor. Talking to Empire’s Damon Wise after a film restoration panel at the Edinburgh Film Festival, she confirmed that Scorsese’s next film,The Wolf Of Wall Street would stick with digital, albeit in 2D. “I think Marty just feels it’s unfortunately over, and there’s been no bigger champion of film than him.”
Schoonmaker revealed that while Hugo’s warm tones had delighted the director and persuaded him to embrace the format, there’s much melancholy at the passing of an era. “It’s a very bittersweet thing to be watching films with him now that are on film. We’re cherishing every moment of it. The number of prints that are now being made for release has just gone down, and it would appear that the theatres have converted so quickly to digital.” [Empire]
I don’t have strong opinions on film vs. digital, and I’m red-green colorblind, so I probably miss out on a lot of debates about tone anyway. I never saw Hugo, but I thought all the trailer footage looked amazing. Public Enemies looked crappy in digital, but I think that was more about composition than format. In general, it seems like artist matters more than medium. Obviously, with film, there’s something about a chemical process that seems more “magical” than bits and binary code, but it’s not like most of us actually really understand either. My expert analysis is that one seems “chemistryish,” while the other is more “mathy.” Take your pick. What’s going to happen is that a lot of fruity liberal arts majors like us are going to continue to learn just enough about the engineering process to keep making pretty pictures about our hearts and wieners. “So the electrons pass through the Sherman hose and get converted to lumens by the spacklinator? Well that’s all well and good, but what happens when the Valens rod over-torques the whole limbic system? I mean what happens then? Where will I put the flim-flam? And please, answer in the form of a poem.”



“and I’m red-green colorblind”
cf. the Filmdrunk site theme
That explains why those red and green t-shirts he keeps bringing up are neither red nor green.
What digital has over film is that it feels like Nicki is really stabbing you in the balls with ice picks.
“what happens when the Valens rod over-torques the whole limbic system?”
you just have to reverse the polarity, bro
I think the problem with Public Enemies wasn’t so much the digital as the duffel bag full of ass suckitude. Sad, because the book was excellent.
/haha “books”
Any weapon in the wrong hands can be calamitous. I can’t think of one thing in that movie that was good. The one thing I thought was good, Depp hurdling over the counter in the bank, was actually a stunt player with face replacement. What a piece of shit.
If all movies are going digital, I’m really going to sound like a hipster by calling them films.
every time I post something technical, it sparks the most heated debates
Technical schmechnical. I like your racist posts much better, but then again, most people wouldn’t know a good story if it spit watermelon seeds in their face and made off with their tennis shoes.
I rarely post on here, because I am not nearly funny enough to compete with you guys. But I read comments regularly because you guys get me laughing so hard I poop my pants. Getting my pooped pants quota filled, does not require me to participate. However I just read an article that is closer to a novel with some of the most interesting problems that have cropped up over the short time that film makers and theaters have been moving to digital. It is ridiculously long, but if you have the time it is quite fascinating to read how independent theatre owners are very worried about being able to upkeep the much more expensive projectors the studios helped purchase. If you have time to spare reading it is quite informative.
[www.laweekly.com]
Also I hope I’m allowed to post that. If not, you can delete it and punish me as you see fit. I apologize in advance.
I just noticed via a side link that Burnsy wrote something about that link back in April that I somehow missed. So forget my posting.
And this is why I stay in that back and just laugh.
And poop my pants.
Bill Cosby Bukowski would prefer to answer in a Jelloem:
“So you see, when the flim-flam and the valens are overtorqued, I take the Theo and the Rudy and I shit on their face while Claire ODs on heroin.”
this is awesome
Color blind? Really?
Vince I’m totally sending you this shirt: [www.tshirthell.com]
Somewhere Quentin Tarantino is coked up, choking the life out of a Romanian hooker on his rose petal adorned four poster bed, tastefully perched 5 feet above his infinity pool surrounded by crackling tiki torches, as part of his beloved medium of film shuffles off this mortal coil. The hiss of the rain and the faint screeching of Macaws cannot wash out the panicked gasps of this one– just like every other one– so confident she was in her blossoming youth. Yes, friends, tonight Quentin Tarantino has a boner. But it is a sad boner.
It’s interesting that the quotes from the article are someone else speculating on Marty’s feelings. Marty is a guy that can get shit done. If he wants film, he gets film. He decided that as a filmmaker he needs to use the best tools and so he’s gone digital. I think it’s awesome. Hugo looked brilliant in both 3D and 2D. By going digital, directors can:
- Not wait for dailies, instant review.
- Not worry about film loading, go ahead and film 20 versions of a line read when your actor is in a zone.
- Film is converted to digital and edited and color corrected that way. Save yourself a step (and expense.)
- Not have to lug around sub-par handheld film cameras.
It’s just a natural progression, technology improving the process. We don’t build bridges with rivets heated over coals anymore, so don’t fight progress.
Anyone arguing against digital by whining about color depth or texture is full of it. I don’t think people realize how many films are shot digitally. Winter’s Bone was the first digitally shot film that convinced me it could be done right. Also note any Fincher film from the last 10 years, even Prometheus. Beautifully done digitally.
I see 50 – 60 films in theaters (yeah, I’m still going to call them films) and I’ve been impressed by the progress of the last 2-3 years. Though I’m not holding my hopes high for the increased framerate of The Hobbit. :)