
As the Tom Hanks-Sandra Bullock drama Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close hits theaters today, New Yorkers are voicing their displeasure over the decision by both Warner Bros. and the MTA to air the movie’s commercials in digital subway ads in New York City. Most notably, the commercials are airing on a digital panel at a subway station right next to Ground Zero.
The film is about a young boy whose father (Hanks) dies in the attacks on the World Trade Center and his subsequent search for the answers to life’s questions, and so the ads feature footage of the attacks and smoke billowing from the towers. You know, I could see how that might upset some people in New York City.
“Everybody’s trying to make money off 9/11,” said Bill Doyle, whose son, Joseph, was killed in the north tower.
“A lot of families got upset. Why couldn’t they warn us about this? I don’t think people really realized that these people are really still stressed.”
A Warner Bros. spokesman, Paul McGuire, said the movie company would pull the ads.
“It was never our intention to cause any distress,” McGuire said. “As a result, we will make best efforts to pull the material from pertinent locations.”
(Via the New York Post)
Common sense is a rare treasure these days. I mean, I understand that you want to be able to convey to people that you’ve made a dramatic film that has 9/11 as a backdrop (oh how I miss the Cold War) and you need to show the horrific footage to really hammer home your point.
But I also want to believe that at some point during the video editing process for the TV ads, someone looked up and said, “Hey, I just had a thought – this might upset people.” Then again, I also assume another person just responded, “Nah, people still like Tom Hanks.”



Hazel Jones’ bi-gina is a pertinent location.
In a recent interview, Gabourey Sidibe revealed that if she would have had Wonder Woman’s Invisible Jet, she could have prevented 9/11:
“Bwaay take dat mistah Bin Laden! Coodeh, me is de big bud eena da tree! Who is bruk de jihad, bway?”
In theaters 9/11/12: Red Stripe
Ha! Red Stripe! Nice!
I do apologize for the lack of vaginas in this post. I should have mentioned Chet Haze.
IMDB: A nine-year-old amateur inventor, Francophile, and pacifist….
And they all laughed at me for my script with the 8 year old divorce attorney
I’d bet against Sandra Bullock having a standard issue vagina.
It should’ve been plane to see that this advertising tactic was going to bomb.
I’m torn about this movie. One one hand, it looks like it might be pretty good, it’s got a lot of good people in it, and even though I’m from New Jersey, not New York, it’s close enough that the attacks still hit home for me.
On the other hand, it also looks like a total sob-fest mess cobbled together to rack up award nominations, right down to the crappy U2 music in the background.
I’ll wait for the DVD.
Paul Wahlburger would never have let this happen. He’d have told them to hahden the fahk up, fahkin queeahs!
Well, at least they’re donating the proceeds to the families of the victims of those attacks, so that children who lost a parent, like the one in the film, can go to college, right? Right? They /are/ doing that, right? I mean, no way a bunch of people from a massive, lucrative industry, that is currently attacking fee speech, are revisiting an international-scale tragedy about which the world is still still hurt and confused and angered, just because they correctly assume that most Americans will feel duty-bound to go see it, just to line /their own/ pockets right? Right?
Fee speech. Oops. “Currently attacking free speech”
Bravo sir. Bravo.
[Finishes last white chocolate Nestle Flipz, wipes crumbs from XXXL "Go Local Sports Team and/or College" tee-shirt, stands up too quickly, fights heart palpitations, regains consciousness - begins solo SLOW CLAP]
Look the novel was a thinly veiled reworking of The Tin Drum so its tough to expect its film adaptation to be some heartbreaking work of staggering genius and yet toss a little 9/11 in the mix and away we go with outsized expectations.
Burnsy, please tell me you’ve done/seen an “Oh how I miss the Cold War” supercut. It hackneyed, trite, and not funny… yet everywhere. If not, someone needs to get on this (*finger on nose). My adds:
Casino Royale – first scene with M, 10-20 minutes into the movie
West Wing: S02E28-The Lame Duck Congress, first 20 minutes of the episode
“Why couldn’t they warn us about this? I don’t think people really realized that these people are really still stressed.”
That was my response when I found out Joan Cusack was a robot at the end of Toys.
SPOILER ALERT!
I might be alone here, but not dealing with and moving past your grief after TEN YEARS makes it your problem, and not society’s.
How DARE Hollywood release so many WWII films without warning veterans about them first? See? It’s stupid.
Hey, I still think it was insensitive to release Life is Beautiful. Not because Holocaust jokes aren’t hilarious, but because it fucking suuuuucked.
This movie is not going to make anybody dislike Tom Hanks. You’re thinking of Larry Crowne.