Christopher Nolan (Dark Knight/Memento/etc.) might be the smartest person in Hollywood. (James Cameron is pretty smart too, despite his belief that every movie needs a super-evil villain who drowns puppies and drinks baby blood). Nolan recently spoke with the LA Times about the 3D phenomenon, and in typical smartypants fashion, he didn’t use the phrase “immersive experience” or “thrill ride” once. In fact, I may need to translate.
“The truth is, I think it’s a misnomer to call it 3-D versus 2-D. The whole point of cinematic imagery is it’s three-dimensional. … You know, 95% of our depth cues come from occlusion, resolution, color and so forth, so the idea of calling a 2-D movie a ’2-D movie’ is a little misleading.”
Translation: “Non-3D movies already create the illusion of depth, dipsh*t, that’s the whole f*cking point.”
“The truth of it is when you watch a film in here, you’re looking at 16 foot-lamberts, when you watch through any of the conventional 3-D processes, you’re giving up three foot-lamberts. A massive difference.”
Translation: “3D is too f*cking dim, yo. A motherf*cker watching a 3D movie can’t hardly see sh*t.”
Nolan, who scored a billion-dollar success with “The Dark Knight,” is as secure as any director in Hollywood at the moment. But he made it clear Saturday night that although he was captain of his own destiny [destiny... has captains? -Ed.], it was the studios that built the ship [the ship of destiny].
“Well, let me put it this way: There is no question if audiences want to watch films in stereoscopic imaging, that’s what the studios will be doing, and that’s what I’ll be doing.”
Translation: “I think the sh*t is whack, but if the rats like cheese, that’s what a motherf*cker gotta put in in the traps, gnome sayin’?”
Sorry I had to do that, folks, but you know how the British are. “Bugga me norks guv, Dog’s your uncle Bobby lorrie lift.” What are they even saying?


Poor little Ratner’s cheeto is only 1D : (
Isn’t forcing Chris Nolan to shoot his movie in 3-D a little like forcing John Williams to score a film using nothing but a synthesizer? I mean, he can probably do it and do it well, but dumbing it down doesn’t enrichen the experience for most people or make it easier to appreciate for philistines, it just makes it painful and stupid.
Finally a ‘Foot Lamberts’ tag. LET THE LAMBERTS HIT THE FLOOR LET THE LAMBERTS HIT THE FLOOR!
Sheepish lions that is.
I have no idea what the hell that British guy just said to me but I think I’m going to punch him in the scarf.
I got a foot-lambert at last year’s American Idol Tour concert. It tasted a lot better than the Gaga-inch at Lollapalooza.
Stupid Nolan, join the EU, they use meter-lamberts. That shit owns.
Can we use the Foot Lamberts tag for the next post about Lambert conformal conic projections, too?
Oh, Chris Nolan, I love you. Never leave me.
Note: I used the phrase “that shit owns” ironically. Leave me alone.
When I was in college, my fraternity was the Tri-Lamberts. We were all very bright.
*walks on sunshine to the corner*
Ratner is only there because he wants to buy a five dollar foot-lambert.
thank you michelle now I’ll be singing “laaaaaaambert the sheepish lion” all day at work today
Christopher Foot-Lambert says “16 foot-lamberts? There can be only one!”
Last time I was in Sikeston, MO I ate about 10 or 12 throwed rolls and left a Foot Lambert floating in the handicap stall.
Laaaaaaaaaambert
Are the 3D rumors going to temporarily drown out the insane casting rumors?
‘Cause I heard that the villains were gonna’ be Lady Gaga as Catwoman and Tom Cruise as the Penguin.
*beams down with a Pina Colada*
Well, He jsut got done shoe-horning in some “A Fish Called Wanda” jokes at WL, lets see what ol’ Fekky can do here…
*peruses post*
You know, 95% of our death cues come from collusion, defenestration, coloreds and the occult, so the idea of calling a ritual killing an ‘appalling and nigh pornographic scene of horrific violence’ is a little misleading.
I feel I should point out that Christopher Nolan is an anagram of SPHINCTERAL HONOR.