
(Hurrr, upside down kiss; ur doin’ it wrong)
It was first reported as a rumor on DeadlineHollywood and later confirmed by Sony, Spider-man 4 is off, and Sony is rebooting the franchise. Looks like they were still having script problems, so Sam Raimi told Sony he couldn’t make the planned summer 2011 release date. Rather than replace him on 4, they opted for a total reboot with a new director and cast, planned for 2012. From DHD:
Immediately, the news brought celebration and consternation equally to webslinger fanboys who say the reboot plot puts Peter Parker back in high school. There’s also much unconfirmed speculation that this new franchise will be in 3D. And the fans also recall that, in 1991, James Cameron wrote a treatment for Spider-Man and now they’re wondering if he might helm the reboot. (Sony ended up acquiring his treatment in a legal settlement.)
Let me put an end to their wonderment: no, James Cameron isn’t going to direct a Spider-Man movie. He’s the hottest person in Hollywood, no way he’s dealing with Sony’s bullsh*t and an established franchise. However, now that Spidey is safely back in high school, Sony is free to cast some kid with fruity Zac Efron hair from Wizards of Waverly place or similar (keep your phone on, Taylor Lautner). And of course it will be in 3D because money. Sony couldn’t strongarm Sam Raimi, so they’ll get a director who they can, and it will suck because directors you can strongarm rarely make good movies. Say what you will about Sam Raimi — Spider-Man 2 was the only decent movie of the franchise — few directors do schlock and silliness as well as he does, and the success of the franchise seems more because of him and despite Sony, rather than the other way around. Does anyone even care about a Spider-Man movie at this point? I think we’ve hit the tipping point on Superhero movies. I never thought I’d hear myself typing this, but not every protagonist has to wear spandex.
However, I’d like to see the rebooted Spider-Man look something like this:

wall crawlin in shape actor who is handy with webs but only needs slightly more charisma than Tobey? David Carradine on line 2
Does this mean I should not care about Spiderman 4 more or less than I did Spiderman 3? I’m confused.
So . . . Italian Spiderman. Great movie? Or greatest movie ever?
Well, at least they’re getting rid of Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst. It’d be hard not to improve on those two.
Luckily, this has no impact on Spiderbabe. She shoots webs out of her, uh, you know. It. Is. Amazing.
Italian Spider-Man would get tangled in his own web from talking with his hands all the time.
I can’t even dismissively wank to Spider-Man news anymore because my web cartridge is completely empty :(
Durst? Really?!
It’s Spiderman, Erswi. It’s a whole different level of “blah, wonder if there are any pictures of puppies on this Interweb thingy.”
Pictures of puppies you say?
Here ya go: http://ihasahotdog.com/
But, you know, as annoying as it sounds, this doesn’t have shit on the Spider-Man Broadway musical.
Yeah, they’re really going forward with that. There are signs outside the theater and everything. The comic book musical is happening.
If Sony has their way, be on the lookout for Cam Gig-Whatever the fuck his name is and Taylor Swift to be the leads. Either them or Nick Cannon and Rhianna.
Somewhere Chris Brown is curling his monkey fist.
*ahem*
What I meant to say was that somewhere Malkovich is committing to an art film about a cub scout leader who drinks his own urine.
Now Casper Van Dien can play the role he was born to play…. High School Punk #2!
i think the only way to make he spider-man movies sucessful are to follow any of these plots
http://danarchy.youfailit.net/Spiderman/
http://media.photobucket.com/image/spider%20man%20fucking/bobmitchell/blog%20pics/venom.jpg