
Youth in Revolt isn’t a movie about which I can say, “Go see it! You’ll love it!” Because, based on word of mouth and a lot of other reviews I’ve read, there’s a good chance you won’t. I don’t know why. Maybe it’s because it’s a “small” movie. It’s not hugely ambitious, but it seeks only to be charming and entertaining, and it succeeds.
What I can tell you is that I loved it. I went in expecting a high-concept laffer (that’s Variety slanguage for a straightforward comedy with an easily-explained premise) about awkward Michael Cera using his vulgar alter ego, Francois Dillinger to get laid. Game, set, snatch. Instead I got this sort of extended, absurdist riff. It was a pleasant surprise — quirky in the original sense of the word, when it still meant charming and strange, and not obnoxiously twee. It manages to be offbeat in a way that’s intelligent without feeling smug, and honest without being cringe-inducingly earnest, like so many indie films and your fruity love letters.
Youth in Revolt feels strange in that it reminds me of Confederacy of Dunces (a now-dated but cult-classic comic novel), in that a lot of the comedy comes from the characters’ overly formal and preposterously large vocabularies (“Oh Bernice, she’s like our angel of the lavatory.”) It doesn’t explain every joke, and plays out like a subtle Road Trip or American Pie, or a less gimmicky Napoleon Dynamite, introducing characters or plot points that seem inconsequential at first, only to reemerge at the perfect time for maximum comedic effect.
It’s an old-fashioned style, but it works because Michael Cera has incredible timing and the writing is sharp. I can understand it feeling banal, but for me it’s the little flourishes that make it. Take the line from the scene that’s in the red-band trailer:
SHEENI SAUNDERS: Nick, you’re being so bad.
FRANCOIS: Not half as bad as the nasty things I wanna do to you right now with my tongue.
For me it’s the “right now with my tongue” part that makes it; the odd specificity that takes it from just cute-but-who-cares to something special. There are so many times when the dialog is just detailed enough or clipped at just the right moment (odd because I was no fan of writer Gustin Nash’s last movie, Charlie Bartlett). Miguel Arteta’s direction walks a similar, artful line. There’s a moment, just after Nick Twisp’s (Cera) mom and her loser boyfriend (Galifianakis) have moved him out to the country where he meets pretentious Sheeni Saunders and realizes he’s in love: it’s just one shot, a slow motion hold on Michael Cera’s face as he blinks while water pours down his chin, but… it’s brilliant. Perfectly timed, inexplicably hilarious, and says so much with so little.
Zach Galifianakis, Justin Long, and especially Fred Willard do well in supporting roles (yes, Justin Long. He’s never been more than just present for me, but he’s great in this), but you could say that they’re all underutilized in a plot that just floats along without them. To a great degree, it’s a writer’s movie. So much of it relies on subtle, clever wordplay (which of course isn’t very realistic). The protagonist dreams of being a novelist, and everything seems to hinge on characters writing letters or reading each others’ journals. And there are plenty of jokes like the one about Sheeni’s boyfriend Trent writing “futurist percussive poetry.” I’m not sure if that’s funny if you haven’t sat through an awful poetry reading or a bullshit college arts class, but it was hilarious to me. I guess what I’m trying to say is that if you didn’t like this, it’s probably because you’re not smart. (Not really).
(Maybe).
Grade: A-
Okay, one criticism: Zach Galifianakis burns some sailors when he sells them a car with a shoddy transmission. That the sailors are after him is the reason he takes the family out to the country, to hide out. When they get back, they find the car in the living room. Zach Galifianakis: “There’s no door big enough to get that in here. They must’ve taken it apart and reassembled it.”
Cera’s Mom (played by Jean Smart): “But that would’ve take an army of mechanics.”
Galifianakis: “Or a Navy.”
Need I point out the ridiculousness of this plot point? That was one moment where they wrote in a preposterous (and unnecessary) event for almost zero payoff.



Is it just me or does Michael Cera always play the same character?
Jesus, I forgot the guy from ‘Charlie Bartlett’ was involved. I fucking hated that movie.
Riddle me this, Vince. If I say that Charlie Bartlett was the uppity faggot version of ‘Ferris Bueller’s Day off’, would I also think that this movie is the uppity faggot version of ‘Fight Club’ or the uppity faggot version of ‘The New Kid’?
Yeah, yeah, whatever, Shakespeare, now what did Brendan’s mom think of it?
Dude, I hated Charlie Bartlett too. This was more intellectual nerditry than uppitous faggotism.
Zog have alter ego once. Zog eat him.
Some navy guys once ran a train in my living room. Lots of seamen…
Seriously, you didn’t like the car plot point? I haven’t seen it yet, but that “Or a Navy” line seems like it was tailor made for Zach’s delivery.
(yes, Justin Long. He’s never been more than just present for me, but he’s great in this)
So, we used to be cool.
Is this Vince’s faggot-y alter ego Raul Liberace writing? Ohhhhh we got you silly goose, trying to get Vince in trouble
I am seeing the shit out of this movie.
Obnoxiously twee ? I take offense, Sir ! There can be no such thing.
Ok, I’ll give it a try based on intellectual nerditry, but if this thing gets uppitously twee on me, I’m blaming you.
Elmer Fudd stopped reading the comics because of the “uppitous twee” that eats Charlie Brown’s kites.
The navy guys I’ve encountered got their rides in the back door.
Besides, I haven’t seen a good movie that involves taking a car apart and reassembling it indoors since ‘Real Genius’.
So if I go in expecting a searing examination of juvenile schizophrenia I’m sure to be disappointed ? Sucks to be me.
Instead I got this sort of extended, absurdist riff.
Rock Lobster?
I got the film too, and much like mentioned above, I’m not sure I can recommend it to others despite the fact that there were some thanks that struck me really funny. The two best scenes to me did involve mushrooms. And the whole scene in the dorm with the dirty talk was actually much better than the part quoted in the article; that dialog was the least of it. I liked it a lot, but I’d recommend it to maybe half of my friends and only about 5% of people I know in general.
Fuck this, He will go watch that nuke vid on Gamma Squad for two hours before He watches this yIntagh pile of forshak.
I should proof-read before I post. Thanks = Things. Whodathunkit?
The Mighty Feklahr is certain that Cera doesn’t take any shrapnel, hide in a shed, or kill guys with axes and circular saw blades in this film.
That awkward, pudgy Indian kid was my favorite. The slow zoom on his fat face at the school killed me.
Hmmm…sounds like *somebody* went to community college.
You had me at “Youth Revolt isn’t a movie”. Now I don’t have to ever see it, therefore passing the savings on to me, the consumer.
Yeah, pass. Michael Cera is starting to give me cancer.
Stark hipster ennui or GTFO!
Somebody tell Michael Cera that Brendan’s Mom wants her pants, bracelet, sunglasses and facial hair back.
“…moved… out to the country…”
Did he eat a lot of peaches?
Somebody tell Michael Cera that Keanu Reeves wants his blank expression back.
Presidents of the USA ref?
*swoon*
Sun soakin’ bulges in the shade.
I’m flying out to Cali, so if my plane crashes, you all can have my stuff.
I abhor the fact that you feel the need to explain what A Confederacy of Dunces is.
This is not a reflection on you but on the public at large.
Michael Cera has been typecasted as teh “Progeria face” kid.
For reals? You’re flying down? In that case I call dibs on your CD’s!
Youth in revolt is when my phone has just finished recharging.
No seriously, WHAT THE FUCK IS A YUTE?!?!
Meat me in San Fran. I’m keeping the Pantera CD’s, BTK.
My alter ego is a responsible self motivated company man who only shows up when my superiors are around.
Confederacy of Dunces. Isn’t that about a fat-ass loser hot dog vendor that masturbates to fantasies about his dead dog?
With a flower in my hair? Maybe. Details later. [pulls on stalker mask]
[makes note] bury Pantera CD’s with noMo’s charred remains
hehe “meat”
hee hee
*splooge*
Wait, is that still Donk’s avi?
Wait, if I’m here all alone why are my pants still on?
[Gets radical by doing epic one handed hand stand dick helicopter]
Gnarly!
*rides in on scooter pulling a red wagon full of piss boots*
sigh
que cera que cera
[Opens box from Acme. Puts on rocket rollerskates. takes off, goes out of control and flies off cliff]
this movie sounds A LOT like Tokyo Drift. A LOT!
There’s already talk of a sequel, where the Francois character travels to the Orient to help mortally-ill kids die with hono(u)r.
Youth In Asia.
That street behind Michael Cera is just like his career:
One way with no right turns.
True story: in high school, I made up a name for MY alter-ego … “Alphonse Duboir”.
That’s as far as I got with that, though.
Alf owns Dubai?
He probably has all the pussy he can eat!
The bit about the car is straight from the book. And since you compared this to Confederacy, I highly reccomend the book, since I’ve always thought of Youth In Revolt as the teen version of it. (The author wrote a bunch of good absurdist books, there’s even one about pigeons.)
Did they explain the car bit in the book? In the movie, it’s just too one-off and random for the sake of randomness to have any positive effect. Doesn’t make sense that guys mad about a car not working would have the time and know how to take it apart and put it back together again.
In what way do you think Confederacy is dated? Just curious.
Not in a specific way, just dated in the way that anything comedic eventually won’t be as funny to someone not seeing it in the time period in which it came out.
That’s true :(