SPIDER-MAN 4 ON HOLD??!??!??!??!?
12.17.09Take this news with a grain of salt because it’s a rumor that came from a blog — or snort the salt, take a tequila shot, and squirt the lime in your eye — but IESB claims they have it on good authority that Spider-Man 4 is on hold indefinitely. The reason? Sam Raimi and Sony can’t agree on a villain.
Raimi is pushing hard for the Vulture to be the big baddie, something he also pushed for in the third film. Vulture was to do his evil deeds alongside the new Goblin and Sandman. Vulture and Flint Marko (Sandman) would have been cellmates who escaped together, with Vulture pressuring the more passive Marko into committing crimes.
On the flip side, our source says Sony seems to only be interested in featuring which ever character is selling books right now but basically they have no idea, just not the Vulture.
Oh, and the film is known as SPIDER-M4N within the production offices so take note!
Sandman was the lamest villain Spider-Man ever fought (the best? Doctor Octopus by a mile), so I don’t know why they’d want to bring him back [update: yes commenters, my bad, they were only talking about Raimi's original idea for Spidey 3]. He’s basically Meatwad from Aqua Teen. But in either case, in a just world, Sam Raimi could tell Sony, “Hey, did you just call it ‘SPIDER-M4N’? Here, go play with this ball of string while the adults write a movie.”


Coincidentally the previous Disney executive referred to Old Dogs as Nut Shot Record Scratch
They don’t want to bring Sandman back; they’re just saying what Raimi’s original idea for Spidey 3 was.
Is “SPIDER-M4N” pronounced “spider muffin”?
If not, it should be.
Because Carnage would just be a stupid idea.
The article excerpt does not say that Sandman would be in Spiderman 4. It says what would’ve happened in Spiderman 3 if the studio didn’t shove Venom down Raimi’s throat.
Which in and of itself sounds like a great porn.
[Thinks for a minute]
Nope, I don’t give a lick.
@Crappy
A bit slow for now, I know.
Juicebox just totally stepped on my dick.
The idea for Spiderm4n isn’t to have the Vulture team up with Sandman, that was Sam’s idea for Spid3rman until the studio made him include Venom.
Is this not one of the properties that need to keep making movies or else risk Disney taking them? I know F4nt4stic is, but wasn’t this as well?
2piderman was so much better than Sp1derman.
If this movie took place anywhere near me, the villian out to get Spidey would be a big wad of Kleenex.
I say make Whiplash the villain, and let’s see him give it to Tobey.
Mort: I cannot wait to read that instead of working today. You had me at “THE FUCKER COULDN’T TELL FACT FROM FICTION!”
Wake up, spaz!
The Sandman could have been omitted from the movies entirely. Because he visited me first hand from about 20 minutes in until the closing credits.
Chino: most appropriate song for Iron Man 2 trailer?
(duh-na-nuh-nuh-nuh) “RE!”
(duh-na-nuh-nuh-nuh) “SPECT!”
(duh-na-nuh-nuh-nuh) “ROURKE!”
(duh-na-nuh-nuh) “WHADDAYA SAY?”
Thanks broham!
Spidey shoot sticky goo from his palms, I shoot sticky goo into my palms.
Empty fifi stash :(
Hey Spaz, send me an email.
filmdrunkards@hotmail.com
Walk on home, boy.
I’m just puttin’ it out there, but whomever they decide the villian is, they should totally cast JGL in the part.
I actually did think of him as a Joker replacement after seeing his monologue on SNL.
They should cast a giant vagina as a villain. Tobey won’t go anywhere near that.
I think an villain that everyone could get behind hating would be a surfing dog.
A villian that is selling books right now… Well if they really wanted to go with what it is hot… and they usually do. You know that matters more than actually making a good film…. they should make Morbius “The Living Vampire” they villian. Seriously. Have Neil Patrick Harris play Morbius (That is the guy from Twilight right?)… you make him Morbius “The ‘is he gay or not’ Vampire.” We all know he is… but teenage girls don’t… and of course… They could make shirts. Team Spidey. Team Moby.
the* villian