ROMAN POLANSKI’S APPEAL DENIED
12.21.09
(“I’M SO JEALOUS OF THIS DOG.”)
Oh the legal system. So last year, Roman Polanski’s lawyers tried to get his conviction thrown out on account of prosecutorial and judicial misconduct. The court ruled then that Polanski would have to surrender to authorities before he could pursue such a case. His lawyer’s then appealed that decision. Today that appeal was denied.
“We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in applying the fugitive disentitlement doctrine [which says that an appeal may be rejected on the grounds that the appellant is a fugitive] and refusing to consider dismissing the action,” Justice Laurie D. Zelon wrote. “We do not disregard the extremely serious allegations of judicial and prosecutorial misconduct that have been brought forward, but urge the parties to take steps to investigate and to respond to the claims.” [LATimes]
Knowing Roman Polanski, he’ll probably just refuse to believe that anyone could deny his appeal and slip the judge a couple quaaludes. *hits cow bell*

Alternate picture caption: Polanski Obedience School is open for business!
what the hell is wrong with that baby’s haircut. He’s got a half mohawk, other half read hair, and a 87% chance of diabetes.
Roman Polanski’s appeal has always been questionable, that’s why he was carrying the quaaludes in the first place.
Plus he knows how to vogue.
Guess I should have read the post before dick-stepping the author, huh?
http://www.bombombombomwooooo.com
So in LA, the fugitive disentitlement doctrine overrules the celebrity entitlement doctrine. Good to know.
Well, that’s one less septuagenarian rapist we have to worry about.
Polanski doesn’t recognize the authority of the judge as superior to his. After all, he’s got experience in overruling objections too.
LA’s celebrity entitlement doctrine went out of control once they started letting Judge Reinhold preside at trials.
This guy is taking all the fun out of anal rape. Well, maybe not all of it.