
Fox’s suit against Warner Bros over the rights to Watchmen (trailer here) was scheduled to go to trial in January. Today, the judge who denied both sides’ original request for summary judgement (a decision without a trial) reversed himself, ruling that Fox owns partial rights to the film.
“Fox owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute the ‘Watchmen’ motion picture,” the ruling said.
Fox acquired rights to the “Watchmen” graphic novel in the late 1980s for the producer Lawrence Gordon, but eventually dropped its own plan to make a movie.
Mr. Gordon later pursued the project with Universal Pictures, and then with Paramount Pictures, before shooting it with Warner and Legendary under an arrangement that allows Paramount to distribute the film abroad.
In ruling on Wednesday, Judge Feess advised both Fox and Warner to look toward a settlement or an appeal.
“The parties may wish to turn their efforts from preparing for trial to negotiating a resolution of this dispute or positioning the case for review,” he said. [NYTimes]
If all you care about is being able to see the film as scheduled in March, this may not be a bad thing. Basically, the judge is telling WB that they have to negotiate with Fox, and to try to come to an agreement now rather than waiting for a trial next month. If they can hammer something out before then, the release will probably go as planned. And now that Fox officially owns a piece of it, both companies have a financial stake in getting it released on time.
But from a principle standpoint, this sucks. Fox doesn’t deserve shit. If you have the rights to a book and you don’t do a goddamned thing with it for 20 years, you don’t get to come in and demand a percentage only after someone else makes it into a hit. If Fox had made Watchmen no one would be trying to take credit for it, I guarantee you. It would look like Fantastic Four, or God forbid, Dragonball. Fox deserves to get reimbursed for whatever they originally paid for the rights, and that’s it. See? I should be the judge. I’d wear a fez and a shiny vest and sit Indian-style on top of my desk, and after I made a ruling I’d nod my head up and down twice, and then my shirtless black bailiff would spit fire. And you can appeal a ruling, but only if you wrestle the bear. And the bear wears one of those wigs like they do in England.










Stop waiting up for Santa, Vonce.
Holy hell Vince, I didn’t even read this yet but WTF aren’t you supposed to be asleep with visions of sugar plums dancing or some fucking thing?
Also, is Blue Dude sporting an 18-pack and a johnson the size of a small child?
Burnsy, shut the fuck up.
Garters are critical crime-fighting gear. For reals. So is a giant rack.
I already “watch men” in the showers at the Y.
Blah, blah, blah, Watchmen. Wake me when you want to talk about real movie news like Hotel For Dogs.
“Hotel for Dogs” you say? Link please.
I think you mean ‘Wash Men’ , Pauly.
El Topo, how the fuck am I going to wash men and ‘bate at the same time? Think man, think.
Amature.
Keep in mind, I thumb my ass and pull on a make-shift noose around my neck all while holding up an issue of Feild and Stream with my feet when I ‘bate, kind sir.
Merry Christmas Fox!
I was hoping they’d get rape.
Fox is the douchiest company ever. EVER.
On the bright side, merry Christmas, y’all!
According to Santa, kiddyporn = naughty, so it looks like another lump of coal for me.
Pauly’s super hero alter ego is called “Mr. Bater”.
I think I’d be more like Percy Mankiss, protector of the Chest of Spooge.
Not to go off topic from the rest of the comments, but the ruling actually isn’t as sucky as it seems. Putting aside the fact that Fox is horrible, the simple point is that contracts are enforceable.
This is going to hurt Warner, but will end with all of the studios doing the proper diligence in the future and getting all the rights they need before completing and marketing a brilliant film that they don’t have the right to distribute (and it will be brilliant).
Substantive comment finished. Carry on.
A good analogy would be if Carrie Underwood got married, then I would be able to sue the dude because I already called dibs.
*hopes to fuck that someone says this is true*
…a brilliant film that they don’t have the right to distribute (and it will be brilliant).
Or, it may be a pustular pile of penis puke.
I hope not, though. I’m sick of cleaning that shit up.
*pours warm cup of Christ’s afterbirth*
Mmmmmmm… Smeg Nog.
Hey, Milkshake, how much does Fox pay you to suck it’s dick?
I hope its more than these guys pay me!
If you can sue people for dibs, then I’m gonna’ sue Scarlett Johansson for marrying my beloved Ryan Reynolds. I saw him first, dammit!
Patty you can have Ryan so long as EVERYBODY recognizes that I dibsed Scarlett first. When she was like 11. I’m clever that way.
Patty, I think you’re going to have to fight me for Ryan.
And when’s the last time you were in a knife fight with a Mexican?
Esrwi, what you call “clever” might be illegal, and will have the FBI at your door.
P-Diddly, you should know my style better than that by now. I never did anything about it when she was 11. I just dibsed. Nothing illegal about dibsing, right?
I also dibsed Katherine Heigl when she was 12 and she was in My Father, The Hero and Under Siege 2. Hey, whadaya want from me? You win some, you lose some.
Well then. I think we may have two different definitions of “dibs”. It may be a regional thing.
My apologies.
Yeah Pauly, he’s not talking about the way we call dibs on each other.
*winks, tugs balls, sprays load on the cat*
<—-So did Pancho Claus bring anybody else several dozen tamales, or was it just me?
Never been in a knife fight, but I do have a giant, horror movie-esque kitchen knife. Ryan is mine!
El Topo, call me Sancho Claus. *winks, tips sombrero, shoots pistols in the air*
Yeah man, I was wondering who left the VHS copy of ‘Wetback Mountain’ in my stocking/pair of ‘chucks’.
I give you a VHS. Then give your woman a STD. Hoe, hoe, hoe, it’s Sancho Claus.
I got a lovely Navidad serenade from Jose Fellatiano. That gringo hums a sweet tune…
I’m only kidding, I don’t know the guy’s name OR his nationality.
Fox’d probably get Ratner to direct it too, but he’d only agree because he thought they said “hey, you wanna do and watch men?”